Видео

The driver is in a suit that limits his motion and he is driving in a straight line and you can't see him move much and that means it is fake.?

1:30 the soil is different colour and that means it is fake - really?

Source - trust me bro

In fact it looks so fake

NASA original photographs of the MOON Surface = GREY colour. CHINESE original photographs of the MOON Surface = Brown colour . INDIAN original photographs of the MOON Surface = Brown colour . What colour is it ? In 1969 - USA astronauts went to the MOON !!!!!. Each of them - was in DEEP SPACE for at least 7 days. Since then many , many astronauts have been in Space . ( All in INNER SPACE - NOT DEEP SPACE . ) The USA astronauts after coming back to earth from DEEP SPACE in 1969 , were able to get out of their spacecraft & walk around with NO HELP. The various Astronauts who were in INNER SPACE since then - ' ALL NEEDED HELP TO STAND & WALK AFTER their SPACE TRIPS ' Hey , but I forgot - in 1969 - these were all USA SUPERMEN - They were NOT AFFECTED by ZERO GRAVITY .

Propaganda...! It is that simple..The USA and other countries have not hidden the details of the Apollo missions....

04:41..."We need tangible evidence ...documentary evidence..." Seems like it slopped your mind that the USSR were given samples of moon rocks..and that the Soviets TRACKED the Apollo missions to the Moon and back,,Putin erases and replaces actual facts ? You are lying and ,most people KNOW you are lying.. As for evidence ..30,000 high quality photos, hundreds of hours of film and video..180 kilos of moon rocks and core samples..photos of the landing sites taken by non US missions ...

Why does he look so unhappy....Hmmm? I wonder if he has been threatened ..BTW the Soviet missions he was talking about where the cosmonauts needed treated were missions of over 4 weeks . 8 weeks 19 weeks or 26 weeks ...Not just a few days as in the Apollo missions....We call that being willfully dishonest...

Weird,,,,Before Putin's invasion of Ukraine , Russia's space scientists and experts all agreed that the Apollo Lunar missions happened as recorded in history...But all of a sudden that has been reversed and the enemy ( the West in general and the USA in particular ) are all liars and only Russia is telling the truth ! Am I the only one that can smell rats?

I spent 2-years, 2014 thru 2016 studying Apollo. 6 or more hours a day, 250-days a year. Over 3,000 hours of work and research. Another 10-hours a week from 2016 thru 2018. Another 1,000 hours. Over 4,000-hours of research, and analyzing photos and videos. Conclusion: They did NOT go. A big fat fraud. Not even a grain of sand of doubt.

Thank you.

Have you read Wagging the Moon doggie?

non-sequitor, red herring, false dichotomy and simple strawman. outer space is a physical impossibility, in blatant violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. gas. fills. any. available. space. in order to breathe air within our pressurized system (directly adjacent to an infinite vacuum), you should initially understand that this would not be an option if you still believe outer space is real...

They never went to nowhere period, its a big circus a entertainment for television zzzzzzombies without any scientific methodology period!!!

Isnt science supposed to be repeatable?

Guess what, the iss doesn't house floating actors either, and the hairspray queens are all here on earth in planes, in pools, and sound stages. India, China, Japan, Russia, USA, all are cartoon jockeys, they have put nothing on the moon.

After over 52 years, has anyone gone back yet? Not even a manned lunar fly-by? Nothing?

01:00:24 Konovalov " analysis " the Apollo 11 rocket launch ..as he obviously has no idea about the subject...he states " There's no need to go into details " ! Actually THERE IS A NEED TO GO INTO DETAILS ..IT IS CALLED PROOF.....

46:13 No ! Kubrick and his team did not travel to Africa,...Just FOUR people traveled to South Africa to shoot stills for the film and a very good friend of mine, who died recently, Robin Browne was one of them... The reason why they shot low sun, oblique, subdued, evening and dawn lighting was because if you used DIRECT BRIGHT LIGHTS you washed out the Front Projection image ...NOTHING TO DO WITH THE APOLLO MISSIONS...IF Konovalov is a cinematographer he should know this....and if he does HE IS KNOWINGLY LYING ABOUT THE LIGHTING !

00:45:36 So Konovalov ( cinematographer ) is now a rocket scientist and physicist . But his STUPID claim that Kubrick took ONE YEAR to shoot " The Dawn of Man " Front projection scene is totally WRONG !... But here is an ACTUAL FACT ...the amount of time Kubrick took to shoot the WHOLE FILM was EIGHT MONTHS ...Konovalov is lying ....! And .yes. I was working in the UK film business in the 1960s...and yes I worked with many of those who were on "2001 " and I did work with front projection..Konovalov does not KNOW what he is talking about...

Did I miss something here ..15 minutes in and this " cinematographer " turned unqualified expert in rocket propulsion ...( knowing how to use a camera does not make you an expert rocket scientist ) refers to the obviously superior Soviet N1 rocket with 36 engines...but fails to explain that it was an unmitigated disaster and blew up on every launch...killing 48 people on the ground in its last test...

01:00 First lie in the first minute...Konovalov says he has examined all the Apollo lunar photos and found that thed are ALL faked...There are around 30,000 of them ans he has seen them all and BTW he is the ONLY person in the world to claim this...?! And as you correctly stated Google AI did find that the photo was faked ...because it was assembled from 3 different Apollo photos....BY GOOGLE AI ...No such real Apollo photo exists or ever could....

55:21 The idiot states that you make the camera wobble by hitting the leg of the tripod with the edge of your hand.. Yes that would make it shake from the side...not up and down...the camera was NOT on a tripod it was mounted on single pole with an electrically operated pan & tilt heads on the Lunar Rover... This meant that any movement of the LRV would cause the camera to shake.. If someone was sitting on the Rover it would go up and down... And speeding up the video as has been done here. also makes it look fake ! As for the " foam camera " claim ...if it was foam it would not flash reflecting the sun ..as it does ....and it looks LIGHT because they are ON THE MOON..it weighs about one sixth of what it would on EARTH ! That fact alone shows they were on the MOON! So Putin has ordered that the Apollo missions must be proclaimed as faked....HE IS SO TRANSPARENT !

00:35:47 This photo shows the RCA standards converter for APOLLO 11..It converted the NON standard 320 Line 10 FPs Black & White TV footage to 525 line 30 FPS US Broadcast Standards ( NTSC ) ... It has NOTHING to do with Apollo 17 or anything to do with transferring film to video.. The back of the TK22 camera can be seen at the top center of the rack. HE IS LYING ....THERE WAS NO FILM PROJECTION INVOLVED...The small monitor screen was to display the incoming TV signal and had a long persistence phosphor.But it is inside the rack and NOT VISIBLE !.There was also a video disc frame store to add missing frames...All this info is available from RCA and it has been for MANY YEARS... HE IS LYING !

18:10 Starts talking about " forced perspective " and using model cars etc,...But all that relies on a lot of editing ...and that we do not see in ANY of the Apollo Broadcasts ....

16:48 GOTCHA ! Konovalov :" The thing is, the first live broadcast of Apollo 11 lasted two hours and 40 minutes.." ( But you said that there was no live broadcast it was all film...) Preenter: ( Tries to rescue the situation )" ..I remember they were broadcasting it on NASA's internal channel ...( No such thing ) Shall we tell them that they weren't live on air for almost the entire country ...? " (A LIE ) " Then let;s not....( because he is lying ) ...and he does not look old enough to have watched it live either...

15 :29 Komovalov LIES about tHe Apollo 16 Lunar Rover sequence know as the "Grand Prix". ( he says it because he thinks the driver is a doll ) and holding his arm up says - "It sits there and makes a gesture. like this with its hand for three minutes... not once does his hand move in those three minutes.." OK so the whole sequence is ONE MINUTE THIRTEEN SECONDS..and most of that time the LRV is going away from us. HIS LEFT ARM IS CLEARLY VISIBLE FOR TWELVE SECONDS when returning towards the camera ..although WE CANNOT SEE HIS HAND and the LRV AND ARM is bouncing up and down ...he is apparently holding the controls.. SO SAYING THAT HE CAN SEE HIS HAND FOR THREE MINUTES IS A LIE...SHOW THE APOLLO FOOTAGE.

He says ( about the Lunar Rover ) " Here it can be seen- it is a small toy .." THAT IS BECAUSE IT IS A SMALL TOY AND IS NOT ACTUAL APOLLO FOOTAGE ...I understand what you are doing ,,,you know that some of your viewers will actually BELIEVE THAT THIS IS APOLLO VIDEO,,,,,, WHAT CON MEN.!

14:49,,,Konolavov says .."Here is the Lunar Rover " NO IT IS NOT- YOU ARE SHOWING US A CHEAP FILM VERSION SHOW THE ACTUAL APOLLO VIDEO !

13:54 Why is he showing all these poorly shot sequences from Moontrap ? Why not show actual APOLLO VIDEO ? Let me tell you why ...BECAUSE it is REAL and is VERY DIFFERENT TO MOONTRAP !

13:15 Konolavov lies when he says the Apollo footage was shot on a film camera at 60 FPS...DOES HE KNOW HOW TO TELL VIDEO FROM FILM? Is he a cinematographer ? 13.45 He says that it was all shot on film and copied to video by projecting onto a small screen and " re-filmed " by a television camera.. This is basically a bastardized version of what happened to the Apollo 11 non standard 320 line 10 FPS video,,which was converted to broadcast standards by pointing a TK22 TV camera at a small TV monitor to convert the image to NTSC. The problem with his "theory " is not the " rasters " it is that film is still recognizable as film because of characteristics such as grain, hairs, dirt, damage and so on...and then there is the problem of UNEDITED shooting lasting HOURS...what size magazines would you need for film...HE IS TALKING ABSOLUTE NONSENSE ! And BTW ALL APOLLO VIDEO AFTER APOLLO 11 WAS SHOT BY A FIELD SEQUENTIAL COLOR TV CAMERA WHICH HAS PARTICULAR CHARACTERISTICS .... DOES HE KNOW HOW TO ADJUST FOR THE DOPPLER EFFECT ?

12:24 Another fatal error by the expert " cinematographer - He says " Instead of the normal speed of 24 frames per second you need to shoot at a speed of 60 frames per second " It seems like he doesn't understand that the Apollo footage was NOT FILM- it was VIDEO - and therefore he is WRONG..And in the Apollo ERA YOU DID NOT HAVE SLOW MOTION VIDEO>> PLUS ..The Apollo 17 lunar surface footage was from a FIELD SEQUENTIAL COLOR VIDEO CAMERA NO FILM INVOLVED AND NO SLOW MOTION AVAILABLE.. DOES KONOLAVOV KNOW HOW TO RECOGNIZE VIDEO FROM SUCH A CAMERA ....? I DOUBT IT !

00:10:19 Konolavov makes a fatal error...He says " This was 1989 there was no CGI ..Computer Generated Graphics." .( in reference to the film " Moon Trap " BUT THEN SAYS ....00:10:32 " CGI was expensive back then.."..OK so what he said first was a lie..? Or just a mistake made out of ignorance...BUT NEVER MIND the visual effects suck..note the dust billowing up when he falls ( ( 12 :03 ) and avoiding dust being kicked up by hiding his feet down the "hill " scene ( 11:49 )..

09:08 The entry in Wikipedia was removed because you had no idea what you were talking about and the fact that corresponding video footage showed that you were lying...

00:08:18 ...OK he seems to have lost it completely now the background is a Front Projections screen and it is purple because the flag is " blue and red :" Huh ?... So to have front projection using Scothlite screens you need a projector, and as Stanley Kubrick found out, you cannot have shiny reflective things like VISORS in the shot! And you cannot use brightly lit objects in the foreground....and if FP was used you would not need to "stitch photos together " DUH ! the man is a lying MORON !

00:07: 04 " A real person simply could not stand for 7 to eight hours, in a static position ,,,they needed professional models who are used to it.." The man is obviously an idiot,,,so "professional models " are not " real people " ..BTW a mannequin is not a real person...he seems more than a little confused... And absolutely no reason given why someone needed to stand there for EIGHT HOURS !

00:06:36 ..Konolavov claimed there was a shadow from " the mannequin " on the background ,,but claims the background is black ! How does that work.?...In the video footage which he obviously has not seen,,,the "mannequin " is really active,,,not still for" two to three hours " as he claims...He is lying...And BTW how did they " stitch " the photos together ..NO PHOTOSHOP IN 1972..!

TWO MAJOR problems with " cinematographer " Konolavov's i example photo from Apollo 17 ( 00:06:27 ) is that the original can be downloaded and shows NO sign of " stitching together " ...Also more important is that there is corresponding video footage of this photo being taken....! He is lying. I wonder why ?

So Russian ( and Soviet ) scientists and politicians accepted the US Apollo missions as fact ....UNTIL the dictator Putin invaded Ukraine....what a coincidence..You Tube is now publishing Putin's anti western propaganda....

[0:30] - Amazing! Great!.. But there is a question: Why Earth is spinning in the wrong direction ?!

Kinda confused on this video.....did the Cosmonot confirm the US Apollo missions to be real or fake?

Thank you for another very interesting video...! Please create more...

You mean that Americans don't go to Space but Russians do, because they fake it better ? Lol. Space does not exist in the first place and Russians fake it as bad as Americans.

Thanks for the upload - much appreciated ! The references & pushbacks to the Official NASA & Apollo narrative all understood 👍

The programmed agenda to deceive mankind as to the truth of their existential place has survived now over millennia. It comes from evil and its adherents are slaves to it. The Realm is not a sphere in an endless dark void.

20:59 after 7 hours of direct exposure to the sun, cameras with zero insulation, works flawlessly. I would love for someone to try that on the Earth.

18:12 Russian astronots claim to have seen cars from space. Space is fake!!

How did NASA astronots fit through the airlock? There is no way to fit through that small opening with that enormous suit.

the thomas the engine part was pure gold.

Here they show a series of details about the Apollo missions that proves that the moon landings were definitely fake: ruclips.net/video/NBVdWCWfdBc/видео.htmlsi=wyFDzw-DBRfS9cvG